Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Erwin: Do you have reports of this detail on R lenses? Francesco At 09:47 PM 1/27/98 +0100, you wrote: >Super Angular 4,0/21mm: >At full aperture light fall off is quite noticable, so is curvature of >field. Distortion is hardly visible. >At full aperture the image field from center to a radius of 5mm gives good >sharpness and medium contrast. The object outlines are well defined, fine >and very fine details are a little bit soft. Extremely fine details are >very soft with low contrast. So in fact hardly visible. From 5 mm the image >contrast drops rapidly and from 8mm vey fine detail ist just noticable and >fine detail is visible with low contrast. From 11mm astigmatism begins to >reduce the visibility of fine detail. Subject outlines are rendered softly >and in the corners even these details are unsharp. >Stopping down naturally improves the quality. Contrast however stays at a >low to meduim level. Stopping down to f/8 enhances contrast a little, >extremely fine details are visible, but not in the corners and the outer >zones (in horizontal view: the long side of the negative). At f/11 the >optimum is reached and from f/16 the performance drops. There is slight >decentring. >Generally speaking: this lens at full aperture gives a good performance in >the center and if the clear rendition of very fne detail is not the prime >objective this aperture is usable. Modern performance is not possible even >at optimum aperture. > >Super Angulon 3.4/21mm: >At full aperture distortion is negligable, light fall off is reduced and >curvature of field well corrected. >At full aperture the center image within a radius of 8mm gives a crisp >rendition of subject outlines and fine details.,the corners being very >soft. Very fine details are rendered with medium contrast from center to >6mm and with lowish contrast from 6mm to the corners. Extremely fine detail >is just visible, with veruy low contrast and soft edges from center to >about 10mm radius, vanishing in the outer zones. >At f/4 this lens is a marked improvement on the SA 4.0. >AT f/5,6 contrast is improved and extremely fine details are now clearly >visible till the outer zones, the crners still being soft. >At f/8 the optimum is reached, the rendition of extremely fine details is >good with a medium contrast. >AT f/11 and smaller the performance drops. >generally speaking: this lens is a very good performer. its fine qualities >only restricted by the presence of astigmatism that reduces contrast and >crisp rendition of very fine detail. >There is slighrt decentring. > >Elmarit-M 2,8/21mm: >At f/2,8 the light fall off is slightly below SA 34 levels. Flatness of >field is less well corrected as is distortion. >At full aperture the center image with a radius of 10mm gives a slightly >crisper image than the SA34. The generally somewat higher contrast results >in a more clear delineation of fine details. Outer zones and corners are >soft. >The general performance of the E is s little above that of the SA 34 wide >open. This is partly due to the reduction of astigamtism, resulting in >improved rendition of fine details. >At f/4 extremely fine details are visible with good contrast from center to >a radius of 6mm. From there to the corners the image details become >progressively softer, but fine details stay within detectable range, >The optimum is reached at f/8 with a good reproduction of extremely fine >details till the outer zones. The subject outlines, especially in the outer >zones have slightly soft edges, giving an overall impression of a smooth >but not brittle sharp image. Stopping down to f/11 and smaller reduces the >quality. Decentring was not measurable. >generally speaking: this lens is a commendable performer and a slight >improvement on the SA 34. It does not bear the Leica badge with full honour. > >Elmarit-M 2,8/21 ASPH: >At full aperture contrast is high and extremely fine detail is very crisply >rendered from center over a raduis of 11 mm. From then the contrast of >edges drops a little but is still vastly superior to all its predecessors. >Astigmatism and curvature of field are almost fully corrected. Subject >outlines and fine details are extremely sharp and clearly almost lucidly >rendered. In the outer zones and the corners this superior performance >drops naturally. The overall image quality is a quantum leap forwards in >relation to all predecessors and I may add competitors. >To set it in perspective: the performance at f/2.8 is better in all >respects to the SA 34 at f/5.6. >Or: the max resolution of the SA 4 at f/,0 is about 70lp/mm with very low >contrast where the ASPH at f/2.8 has 125lp/mm at high contrast. >AT f/4,0 contrast and the clear rendition of very fine details improves, >with the corners still lagging behind. >At f/5.6 the optimum is reached with exceptional performance including the >far outer zones. >From f/8.0 the performance drops ever so slighly and at f/16 is visibly >below optimum. >Decentring is not measurable. >Overall: this lens gives outstanding image quality at full aperture and >improves till f/8.0. >It is by a great distance the best 21mm in the Leica stable and the only >choice for the person who needs superior performance from a 21 starting at >2.8. > >A full report giving more details about flare, close-up performance and the >hot topic of performance at infinity will be published at my site in a week. >Erwin > Francesco Sanfilippo, Five Senses Productions webmaster@5senses.com http://www.5senses.com/