Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Erwin & others, I hardly understand all your arguments on Leitz's/ Leica's 50 mmm M lenses, which take one aspect only into account most of the times. But, the stuff that really annoys me, is that the differences between Leitz's/Leica's 50 mm M lenses are almost as strong as between different focal length - and hardly anyone cares for the differences. In example: You will find no other 50 mm M lens which handles high contrasts like the old Summar, additionally exaggerating bright lights. Moreover, the Summar's over-pronounciation of bright lights - in common with its softness in the out-of-focus area - agrees to old 1940 Hollywood portraits of movie-goddesses. Different, the Summarit, which is soft, but has a mixture of flat, low-contrast and 3D out-of-focus rendition. The Summitar and coll Summicron agree - maybe at f 2 or f 2.8, but not above. While the Summarit's rendiction compares to the 1.9/73 uncoated Hektor, the coll Summicrons rendition gets close to the rigid chrome Summicron (=NF Summicron). Different again, the chrome Summicron and the black Summicron. You will find no other 50 mm Summicron, which is a low contrast lens but shows so many grey tones as the rigid chrome Summicron. The black Summicron is a middle to high contrast lens between f 2 and f 4, but a low contrast lens above. The current Summicron impresses with it's extreme sharpness, but has an unlucky out-of-focus rendition above f 4.0 (which is easily surpassed by any other 50 mm M lens from Leitz/leica). Further, I never found a middle to high contrast 50 mm M lens from Leitz/ Leica which could compare in the middle or high contrast rendition with the Summilux. Additionally, we all know, that the Noctilux has a special fingerprint, reducing contrasts and showing a white-yellow neutral-warm rendition. And, all the Elmars, which show their "best" performance between f 5.6 and f 8. While the old Elmars create some kind of "glow" - at least in b/w photography - the current Elmar's rendition (at least it's sharpness) agrees to the current Summicron's rendition at these f-stops. All the 50 mm M lenses are so different as different focal length. To concentrate on one aspect only (e.g. sharpness or micro contrast) comes - in my mind - close to ignorance. But, keep in mind also: if you are not honored by the Pulitzer with a Disneyland-Leica, you won't get it with an M6 ESL either. Alf