Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> > I would suggest, again, that if the time difference were significant, > photographically speaking (regardless of whatever the tested number of > milliseconds is), the historical photojournalistic record would not be > so preponderantly full of photographs taken with Nikon SLR cameras. > > Art Peterson > > >______________________________ Reply Separator Art - I think you are correct here, there actually is a time difference, but minimumal. Most professionals who use Leica M cameras do not go into the field with them alone - I don't. They are much too limited in what they can do. I use them along side SLRs. By the way, a few years ago we ran some cold weather testing here of, among other things, the R6. (All mechanical) I was appalled at the long delay it had and ruled it out as a choice for spontaneous work. Jim James H. Barker (Jim) - jbarker@polarnet.com High Latitude Documentary / Ethnographic Photography Fairbanks, Alaska