Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Laney reports s/n 2.015.701 to 2.077.500 for 1964, and s/n 2.077.501 to 2.156.300 for 1965. So, I'd group Bill's 4/90 Elmar into the 1965 production series, if the s/n is 2.090.878. If it looks like a 2.8/90 Elmarit, has f-stop 32, and filter size E 39 additionally, it should be a 3-lens Elmar for sure. Alf - --------------------------------------------------------------- At 08:25 08.01.1998 -0500, you wrote: >20900878 should be from 1963 and thus NOT a three-element lens, as the >three-element design was introduced a year later. 20900878 should be a >plain-jane E39 4/90 Elmar. > >Marc > > >msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 >Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir! > >