Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/12/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jeff, I have been setting it to B now in the bag because I learned that I can't always get the battery that I want, not even the one I need (stone's?) at a moments notice. I have a slight knack on guessing exposure but the meter is a good re-assurer. Steve PS. I got my first roll of film back from the M6 and the 2.8/50 Elmar. The film was the 400CN C-41 processed film. Although the prints came through blue-tinted from the 1-hour photo shop, they showed an exceptional low-grain and broad-based tonal quality unlike any black and white I have ever seen. I took a neg. of my daughter and blew it up on the insta-print machine to 10x12 plus. This looks like TMAX 100 grain size on a 400 film! The contrast and tonal range was superb, no significant grain to speak of. The fabric on her sweater looked real where it was in focus (exposure made at 2.8 at four feet). Outstanding combination. I am told that true fiber-based black and white print media looks even better yet. I was very happy. In fact, I looked at the backgrounds of some scenics I shots and I could see individual corn stalks at near the horizon. In short, contrasty, sharp, wide-tone range and all it needs is to get more and shoot. Steve At 10:53 AM 12/18/97 -0700, you wrote: > >-----Original Message----- >From: Steve Hickel <smhickel@x2.alliance.net> > >>I like the small footprint of the lens with it in the body. Makes for an >>easy to carry camera and lens. No other lens currently sold by Leica offers >>that compactness. I learned something about storage in the bag. You mention >>the lens cap coming off, I burned up my battery in two days because as best >>I can figure the shutter was cocked and the way I had the M6 stored must >>have depressed the meter for a long time. The battery was dead after only >>using it a few times. >> >Oh yes, I like the lens very much too. The comparison to an enlarging lens >was not meant as disparagement, but of wonder--so small! No significant >complaints here. > >Bummer about the M6 battery; I hope to get an M6 sometime (has anyone in the >US gotten a very clean one in the $1300 range recently?) and I admit that >I'm very unlikely to keep the shutter set at "B" or keep the camera >uncocked, so for me, I guess if the battery goes dead, it goes dead. Seems a >waste though. > >Jeff > > >