Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 10:16 AM 12/5/97 -0500, you wrote: >No, it's not pick on Eric Day, yet > >Besides, if I'm wrong, I'll be batting 0 for 2 today. First of all, you quoted someone else. I didn't say anything about the 35-350, but I don't think much of that lens either. I'd rather put a 2X on the superb 70-200 2.8 and go longer with the same maximum aperture on the long end. I did say the 17-35 is not as good wide open as the 20-35, but that's because Canon said as much. It was designed for digital cameras. As for Leica competing with Nikon and Canon, all I can say is thank goodness someone is willing to go a different direction! ========== Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch The gene pool could use a little chlorine.