Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - --------------5D1656345174 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Here is the U.S.News & World article... - --------------5D1656345174 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name="1retr.txt" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="1retr.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail-gw2.pacbell.net id FAA06384 [Image] [Image] [Image] 1998 TECH GUIDE Returning to retro-tech Avoiding new gizmos isn't Luddite; in fact, it's often smart Learn more about futuristic gadgets in our 1998 Tech Guide Onlin= e BY RICHARD FOLKERS Let's provoke an argument. Stroll into a crowded camera-club meeting and shout, "I can take my old, beat-up Leica and shoot rings around your automatic junk!" Drop into a snooty, high-end stereo store and proclaim the vinyl phonograph album superior to the compact disk. Or, try uttering, "Sorry, Mr. Gates, I just don't need Windows." Unfortunately, most new high-tech toys, gadgets with a major "cool" factor, don't satisfy for very long. There is always a faster processor, better digital-audio-sampling rate, or smoothe= r autofocus around the corner. Who hasn't worried that a new purchase would instantly become outdated as soon as it left the store? But what if you're happy with what you've got? Or, put as a more heretical question: Do you need new technology? This story is about people who don't. Mind you, they're not cheapskates or head-in-the-sand Luddites, either. These people simply believe old technology makes them better thinkers, more efficient workers, and just a little more comfortable. Through a lens, manually. As Reverdy Johnson surveys a New Mexic= o landscape through his viewfinder, it is he, rather than an automatic camera, making the decisions. Unlike Johnson's gear, today's techiest cameras will load and wind the film for you, calculate exposure, set the correct shutter speed and lens opening, and focus themselves. Johnson, a Santa Fe attorney and ardent amateur shooter, uses manual cameras, 1970s-vintage Leica rangefinder and Hasselblad medium-format models, which don't depend on batteries and electronics but on springs, gears, and a photographer's mind. "This creative process is one that entails workmanship. If you've got a machine doing it all for you, you lose that participation," the silver-haired Johnson says. He believes that by having to work at his photography, he is better able to visualize images, to see pictures before he shoots them. Photography, he says, is like driving an old sports car: "It takes a little effort, working your way through the gears, but you feel a lot closer to the road. You've got a relationship to what you're doing. You've got some control over it." Proven wings. Classic equipment, like Johnson's Leica cameras, has a quality of manufacture and design, along with durability, that serious users crave. That's true for more than just cameras. The Douglas DC-3, an aircraft that has been flying for more than 60 years for airlines and the military, inspires similar fierce loyalty. After 18 years of steady service from his four DC-3s, Joe Sparling, chief pilot and president of Air North, isn't planning to scrap them but to sell his fleet to another user. Th= e DC-3, he says, was an obvious choice for his company, which operates in the rugged territory of Alaska, the Yukon, and Canada's Northwest Territories. The taciturn, to-the-point Sparling says the plane is strong, tough, and versatile. "When introduced in the late '30s, the DC-3 was the finest and fastest aircraft of its time," says Bob van der Linden, curator of aeronautics of the Smithsonian's Air and Space Museum. "It's aged very gracefully, and it's never been replaced. It's efficient and easy to fly." Of more than 13,000 DC-3 aircraft built, van der Linden estimates 400 are still flying today, ofte= n carrying cargo to rough landing strips in remote locations. Sometimes, the simplicity of retro technology also makes it the best choice. Consider, as an example, watches--not the kind with digital displays, but ones with faces and hands. Digital watches are usually cheap and very accurate, and, more to the point, les= s popular than are analog ones. In fact, analog watches command almost 80 percent of the market. Analog is a better presentation= , says Joe Thompson, editor of the magazine American Time. "For al= l of the loaded-up, souped-up digitals, it's not as useful as the information you get in a quick glance at your wrist." Hour and minute hands let you quickly gauge time, let you see how much of the hour has elapsed, and how much is to come. There is no menta= l math to do. Try that with a digital watch that's blinking 4:12:34. Thompson also cites the continuing allure of the mechanical watch, a timepiece devoid of quartz-timed electronics, the old-fashioned kind of watch you have to wind. Digital watches just don't have that allure. "A watch says something about you," Thompson says, and "digital has a problem there." Efficiency in computing is Shelley Johnson's concern. An in-hous= e attorney for an engineering company near Philadelphia, Johnson uses her computer for word processing and E-mail. In a modern office, her machine must run on Windows 95, right? Windows NT? Windows 3.1? "My company has Windows. I just refuse to do it," declares Johnson. So, she's a Macintosh loyalist? No, again. Johnson uses MS-DOS, the original program PC operators used before the Web, before computer desktops got cluttered with pictures, graphics, and motion. DOS is all text. You type in commands, and you can't even use a mouse. DOS is simple; it does what Johnson wants. "Windows takes more time to access than DOS. There's more, and for what? More stuff I don't need." Getting what you need and no more is also the philosophy at Hollywood Video. The second-largest U.S. video-rental chain (behind Blockbuster), with more than 800 stores, Hollywood Video can turn an empty storefront into an operating store in just 36 hours. And Hollywood's employees use DOS on their computers, not Windows. Windows technology requires much more hardware and a more expensive PC to run. There's also no doubt that older technology sometimes just feels good. For her writing, Seattle restaurateur Karen Binder chooses a fountain pen. It is, first, a reminder of her late father, who used one. It's also a "personal and intimate" way of communicating. "I'm a big E-mail gal, but if I want to say something of substance and meaning, I send it in ink, in fountai= n pen. When I use my fountain pen, I'm saying something by the act of using it." Pen maker Parker is trying to make the statement o= f using a fountain pen even louder with the reissue of classic pens. The new Duofold Norman Rockwell Limited Edition Fountain Pen is the reproduction of a pen Santa Claus held in a 1929 advertisement drawn by Rockwell. That pen sells for $1,500, a significant price for a warm, fuzzy feeling. (Other Parker models, also based on the 1920s design, but mass-produced, sell for about $350.) In the groove. It is lingering comfort, a love of music, and a desire to share them both with his daughters that keeps John Dillworth listening to phonograph albums. Don't ask him to trash compact disks, though. Dillworth says he's not a "digital must die" album enthusiast. Ann Turner, a reviewer for The Absolute Sound, a high-end audio publication, agrees that there is a place for both technologies. CDs and albums have different strengths. "CDs have perfect pitch stability and low harmonic distortion." Vinyl, says Turner, "has more warmth, a sense of space." Dillworth, 38, a New York computer consultant, has a collection of 800 rock and jazz albums, along with CDs, which are predominantly classical. Of course, album grooves do wear out in time. They require care, to keep them clean and free of annoying ticks and pops. But, for Dillworth, that's fine. Listening to albums is also a way of sharing memories with his daughters, introducing them to music of his youth in the way he heard it. "You can't erase moments like putting records on with your family," he says. Even the most ardent lover of vinyl can't expect to find every new release. Fewer and fewer companies press vinyl. Die-hards ca= n look to the World Wide Web, at companies like Music Direct and Garage-A-Records for albums. Furthermore, not many companies still make cartridges and replacement styluses (needles), either. However, at least one American firm remains an enthusiastic supplier. Jim Rochman, the manager of phonographic products for Shure Brothers Inc., an Evanston, Ill., cartridge manufacturer, says that is because collectors and audiophiles have a special ally: rap and hip-hop artists. Stage performers use records and turntables to get the genre's distinctive scratching sound, whic= h has helped keep Shure's sales strong. For the retro feel with new technology, Mobile Fidelity, a Sebastopol, Calif.-based company, sells CDs that use what it say= s is a proprietary technology to produce recordings that have more of the warmth of vinyl. Prices are premium, though, $30 for a single disk. Another noteworthy category of retro is old-looking just for fun. If classic TV shows like The Brady Bunch and Leave It to Beaver can come back as feature films, why not return to classic office and home furnishings? Sure, you could drop $1,150 on a Herman Miller Aeron chair, with its ergonomic adjustments. But just imagine how you'd feel, instead, in a 1920s-style wooden-swivel desk chair, the kind that supports your entire back almost like you're in a rocker. Pottery Barn sells a reproduction of that retro chair, and for a mere $300. While you're there, if you pin= e for the days before touch-tones and voice mail, grab their Classic Telephone for $70. Its receiver is heavy and its base quaintly unsleek, and the numbers are on a rotary dial--well, sort of. The numbers are really touch-tone buttons. Even retro technology has limits. [Image] Have a comment? Want to read what others have to say? Click here. ------------------------------------------------------------ CREDITS Send comments to webmaster@usnews.com =A9 Copyright U.S. News & World Report, Inc. All rights reserved. This site is engineered by AGTinteractive[Image] =1A - --------------5D1656345174--