Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Bokeh, Roger < sigh, big sigh >
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 18:43:53 -0800

At 05:45 PM 11/18/97 -0700, you wrote:
>
>Not a bit, Alf. You should get as much attention as I do. But, you see, 
>you accept Gestalt-Psychology as a truism. I don't! In fact, I have a 
>lot of trouble with psychology in general. I consider the field a 
>pseudo science. Unfortunately, with common sense being in such short 
>supply, folk are quick to accept, as a wonderful science, what I take 
>for granted.
>
>I don't care if you guys see whatever you want to see, but be careful 
>when you challenge some of us old bucks. We have the advantage of 
>having matured in an era when it didn't matter a whit whether you 
>"stroked" someone's self esteem or not. It was performance and ability 
>that counted, not how well you could see the unseeable and how you felt 
>about yourself.
>
>How's that Bob; right outa Rush's mouth, eh? (If this is a bit obtuse 
>for non US types, my apology, but I couldn't let go of it.)
>
>So, enjoy your boke(h)! Hell, I enjoyed stuff that my "old man" 
>couldn't fathom also. Something to do with the generation gap, I think. 
>Mummble, mummmble, snort!
>
>--
>Roger Beamon  

Well said Roger. As I said earlier, I enjoy the word Bokeh. It saves a lot
of typing. And it gives the pseudo scientific folks something to sink their
teeth into. And that's why all of my cameras have ground glass screens. You
can *SEE* the Bokeh! Which brings up another question... is good Bokeh just
dumb luck with an M camera?

Jim