Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/10/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Pretenders to the Throne
From: hmphoto <hmphoto@delphi.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 07:12:26 +0000

>Glass is a secondary 
>issue.

I kinda disagree with this statement.  Glass is what "makes" the image 
and is the most import issue in the camera system as a whole.  

Yes the EOS 1 is a great camera, I ought to know I have used one 
professionally for the past 5 years, but I am in the process of switching 
from the EOS to Leica M & R both BECAUSE OF THE GLASS.  The leica optics 
are IMO superior to other brands.  The Canon is nice, Nikon nice, but 
when looking at the slides side by side the Canon slides block up in the 
dark areas very badly and have a "plasticy" look to them.  I also tested 
Nikon side by side with Leica several years ago and the Nikon also had 
the same contrast issues.  On top of this the Leica lenses are built FAR 
more ruggedly than the other brands.  Canon and Nikon both now use a lot 
of plastic in their lenses and bodies construction.  Maybe I am old 
fashioned, but I prefer metal construction.

If you are simply saying the R whatever are not Leica's because they are 
not rangefinders, well I find that just a little silly.

I buy Leica for the IMAGE quality, which the R is second to none in the 
SLR field, as the M is second to none in the rangefinder field, because 
of teh lenses you stick on the front of the boxes.

Harrison McClary
http://people.delphi.com/hmphoto