Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/10/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]aglang wrote: >Which Nikkors does this refer, RF or SLR, wha\ich are almost certainly different = >designs! Nikkor and Canon lenses are SLR lenses of the period of the test. >On Sat, 11 Oct 1997, Lucien_vD <Lucien_vD@compuserve.com> wrote: > >I just find in a Foto Magazin Extra (January 90) the result of both the >tests of the Summarit and the Summilux 50/1,4 (test date 4/89) (BAS test= s) > >Leitz Summarit 1,5/50 mm(alt) : Optik 8,4 / Mechanik 9,6 >Leica Summilux-M 1,4/50 mm : Optik 9,2 / Mechanik 9,6 > >By comparaison > >Nikkor 1,8/50 mm : Optik 8,5 / Mechanik 9 >(test date 5/86) >Nikkor 1,4/50 mm : Optik 9,8 / Mechanik 9 >(test date 5/88) >Canon FD 1,4/50 mm: Optik 7 / Mechanik 8 >(test date 11/85) >Canon EF 1,8/50 mm: Optik 9 / Mechanik 9,4 >(test date 10/87) > >Not bad for such an old lens. >But did they really check the flare in those tests ?? > >Lucien >BELGIUM >