Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/09/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 11:03 AM 30-09-97 -0700, Roger wrote: >Dan: > >Many times, things are ported here and to the Rollei list that are of >interest to the subscribers of that list. Like I should have asked his >permission before dragging it here? If you get taken to task for >something that you publicly post, that's the chance you take. Posting >to rec.photo is hardly private correspondence. That, I do respect and >will not post to others without the author's permission. > >Lastly, it *is* a heck of a lot more on topic than much else that is >posted here. It may be on topic, but nothing is really accomplished by posting it. All that happens is that you end up with a bunch of people on the LUG patting each other on the back in agreement that this guy is an idiot and doesn't know an ass from a hole on the ground. At least if he was part of the LUG, he would have a chance to respond. By the way, it isn't just Leica that gets kicked around on the rec.photo news groups. I think that the only camera manufacturer that is immune to critism there is Nikon (unless you're a Canon user). Someone shit canned Minolta the other day, and I may just let myself be dragged into it. I better make sure I've had all my shots, first. Dan C.