Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/09/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Fantoni, Ernesto wrote: > On Mon, 08 Sep 1997 12:29 Stephen Gandy wrote: > >IN this particular lens (due to > >design changes to save the almighty $$) it is very difficult to take > > >apart the rear element once it has been attacked in order to clean it > > >properly. The only thing you can really do is have a clear one taken > > >apart and rel-ubed with modern synthetic grease BEFORE the problem > >presents itself. I did it on mine, and have had no trouble. My > source > >of information is Don Chatterton. > > Len, > > I confirm what Stephen says. I bought few months ago a slim 4 elements > > Tele Elmarit (I hope we are talking about this Tele Elmarit) and Don > Chatterton told me to be very careful with this lens: he didn't > mention > any grease, he simply said it's almost impossible to clean this lens > as > the rear element is fixed in the barrel. I'm satisfied with the image > quality, anyway. > Is there anybody that can give some infos about the serial numbers of > the bad batch(s)? > Should be very helpful, also to avoid wrong purchases. > > Ernesto Ernesto - For whatever value it may have, the serial number of my lemon Tele-Elmarit-M with the bad adhesive is 2659000. If yours has a number near mine, perhaps it's another one of the bad batch(es). One of the painful aspects of this purchase was that it came from one of the multi-page advertisers in Shutterbug (no, NOT B&H).