Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/09/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Bert,
My apologies. In my previous em on this topic I noted the price of the C=
LE
was NLG 1995. It is in fact NLG 1195.
Vince Lamberti
- ----------
From: =
INTERNET:leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us[COMPUSERVE:INTERNET:leica-user=
s@
mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]
Sent: 03 September 1997 15:05
To: "'INTERNET:leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'"
Subject: RE: CLE
Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[192.147.236.1])
by dub-img-7.compuserve.com (8.8.6/8.8.6/2.5) with ESMTP id
HAA21600;
Wed, 3 Sep 1997 07:58:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (5.65/KJV)
id AA13993for 73561.2234@CompuServe.COM; Wed, 3 Sep 97 04:54:23=
- -0700
Received: from hil-img-10.compuserve.com by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
(5.65/KJV)
id AA13987for /usr/local/lib/majordomo/wrapper resend -C
/usr/local/lib/majordomo/config.mejac/majordomo.cf -l leica-users -h
mejac.palo-alto.ca.us leica-users-outgoing@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us; Wed, 3
Sep 97 04:54:19 -0700
Received: (from mailgate@localhost)
by hil-img-10.compuserve.com (8.8.6/8.8.6/2.5) id HAA00801
for leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 07:54:18
- -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 07:53:56 -0400
From: Vince Lamberti <106623.3440@CompuServe.COM>
Subject: RE: CLE
To: "'INTERNET:leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'"
<leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Message-Id: <199709030754_MC2-1EFF-D2D8@compuserve.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Hi Bert,
The world is really shrinking. I may recently have been looking at the
same CLE you refer to in your em on 2/9. I've seen a reasonably clean
CLE selling for NLG 1995 in a camera store on Laan van Meerdervoort. It
was recently serviced by their technician, and appears to operate perfect=
ly
well. I'm not sure if you looked inside (I'm not even sure I'm referring=
to the same camera), if so I noticed two subtle gouges in the pressure
plate. These will have no effect on image quality, however they may
scratch the film surface.
The price is about right for a CLE body in Holland. I am also aware of
another CLE for private sale. It is a complete outfit however the owner =
is
prepared to seperate. The body with Leitz 40/2 Summicron were selling fo=
r
NLG 1500. From memory the body is in better condition than the one I saw=
in L.v.Meerdervoort. It appears that CLEs are fetching slightly higher
prices in the US. Even more so in Germany where they are advertised for =
up
to DM 3000. I'd be surprised to see someone fork out DM 3000 for a CLE,
since you can buy an M6 for less. The world is not just small, its also
strange at times.
Let me know how you go.
Vince Lamberti
The Hague, The Netherlands
Email: 106623.3440@compuserve.com
- ----------
From: =
INTERNET:leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us[COMPUSERVE:INTERNET:leica-user=
s@
mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]
Sent: 03 September 1997 13:28
To: INTERNET:leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: CLE
Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[192.147.236.1])
by arl-img-5.compuserve.com (8.8.6/8.8.6/2.5) with ESMTP id
GAA16114;
Wed, 3 Sep 1997 06:49:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (5.65/KJV)
id AA13706for 73561.2234@CompuServe.COM; Wed, 3 Sep 97 03:45:48=
- -0700
Received: from mtigwc04.worldnet.att.net by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
(5.65/KJV)
id AA13700for /usr/local/lib/majordomo/wrapper resend -C
/usr/local/lib/majordomo/config.mejac/majordomo.cf -l leica-users -h
mejac.palo-alto.ca.us leica-users-outgoing@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us; Wed, 3
Sep 97 03:45:45 -0700
Received: from default ([207.146.160.166]) by mtigwc04.worldnet.att.net
(post.office MTA v2.0 0613 ) with ESMTP id AAA518
for <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>;
Wed, 3 Sep 1997 10:45:40 +0000
From: "Steven Blutter" <sblutter@worldnet.att.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Subject: Re: CLE
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 05:45:41 -0500
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1162
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <19970903104538.AAA518@default>
Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
I received yesterday the Leica Historical Society's sale book - was looki=
ng
for CL related items... based on those private sale prices - - run to the=
store!
CLE bodies are running around $600>800. (Sorry, left the booklet in the
office)
good luck
steven blutter
- ----------
> From: Bert Keuken <b.k@pi.net>
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: CLE
> Date: Tuesday, September 02, 1997 1:27 PM
> =
> Hi All!
> =
> Just visited a local camera shop today. They had a CLE on sale for fl
> 1195,=3D (approx. US $ 570), body only. The camera has user marks,
especially
> above the strap lugs. Apart from this the camera operates correctly as
far
> as I was able to check in the shop. Is this a fair price? I'm tempted t=
o
> buy it, any words of wisdom from the LUG?
> =
> =
> Regards,
> =
> Bert Keuken
> homepage: http://home.pi.net/~bertkeuk/home.html