Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Which Leica? HELP !
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 18:52:53 -0400

Clicio, here is MY choice for best leica and lens selection, based upon
what I have myself.  As far as I am concerned, the best M camera is the
current one, the M6.  The built-in meter is simple to use yet suberb in its
ability to do the job.  Save yourself some money and look for a used one.
As far as lenses go, take a hint from a current thread on the list, buy
yourself a Dual Range (DR) 50mm f2 Summicron lens.  This is the 50mm lens
that all others are compared to.  A good used one (they're all used; it
hasen't been built since 1968) is relatively inexpensive compared with
current versions.   Another good lens choice is the 90mm f2.8 Tele-Elmarit.
 It is optically excellent, and its compact size and light weight are what
Leica photography is all about.  Used ones are common and again, reasonably
priced (if that means anything when talking about Leicas!).  A good used
35/2 Summicron would be a good selection as well, though I personally own
the 35/1.4 aspheric Summilux (don't ask me why).

As far as fast lenses go (f1.4 or f1), buy them only if you think you
really need the extra stop and plan on actually using them at that opening.
 Unlike SLRs where a fast lens equates to a brighter viewfinder, there is
absolutely no advantage to the fast lens openings unless you actually plan
on doing low light hand held photography at F1.4 or F1.  There is a BIG
price jump along with weight jump required to get that extra speed.  A
previous post recommended the 50mm F1 Noctilux.  A marvelous lens for what
it is intended for, but compare its size and weight to the 50mm F2
Summicron and decide for yourself  (Then look at the price tag; 'nough said)

Dan C.