Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I am stunned by the statements made that "politics has no place on the LUG." It is a fact of life that all photos represent the politics on the individual photographer, either directly or indirectly. In assessing the life and, yes, the work of Paul Strand, politics is a must. Likewise, with Evans, Lang, Mapplethorpe, Adams, etc. The freedom of speech/free enterprise question on exhibiting photos, paintings and sculpture on the streets of New York is a political question debatable on photo forums. Likewise, the question of publicly financing art exhibitions, including photo exhibitions, is a question of politics relevant to photographers and photo forums. And, more important than anything else, is the question of responsibility. Each photographer is responsible for his or her photos, regardless of what they say, and the statements that the photos make the photographer is making. A commercial photographer can refuse, for example, to work on an advertisement that he is opposed to. Yet a commercial photographer who agrees to do work for an advertisement involving a controversy or controversial product is responsible for promoting a product many people may object to. A photographer may create fantastic photos promoting the fur coat industry, but that photographer certainly knows the controversy involving fur coats and has to take responsibility for promoting fur coats and that photographer is a valid subject of objections. Responsibility during war is no different, either during Nazi Germany or during the history of this country. Photographers whose photos during the Vietnam war helped fuel the anti-War protests take responsibility for what those photos did. Remember, responsibility works both negatively and positively - -- and in both directions. But the question here is whether discussion of that responsibility, political responsibility, is relevant to the LUG. Obviously I believe it is relevant. PHOTOGRAHERS ARE NOT AMORAL, APOLITICAL ROBOTS WITH PHOTOGRAPHIC MOTHERBOARDS.