Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Fwd: 35mm vs 2 1/4, again, my real world experience
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 09:50:23 -0400

At 07:16 AM 12-08-97 -0400, you wrote:
>At 12:52 AM 12-08-97 EDT, DonjR wrote:
>>I will be taking delivery of a Hasselblad system for the sole purpose of
>>comparing the Leica vs. Hasselblad.  Will have the f/3.5 100 mm lens and the
>>f/5.6 Superachromat for the Hasselblad.  ...[snip]
>
>Are you kidding?

After receiving my copy of my post (above), I realized that I violated one
of my fundamental rules of Mail list protocol; Never post anything that is
non-informative and inflamatory, and can be interpreted in an insulting
manner.  For this I make a pre-emptive apology.  My post wasn't meant to be
sarcastic ot insulting, I was just surprised that someone would go to the
expense to make such a comparison.  Of course, not knowing all the facts
(maybe someone is lending DonjR the equipment), I shouldn't jump to
conclusions.

Dan C.