Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Item Subject: cc:Mail Text Ted, Thanks for your honest view on the matter of 35mm vs MF format in the art world. I had orginally asked the question after being told by a gallery director that they had not exhibited any 35mm work over the last year they could remember. It had all been MF or larger. Their comment was a little disappointing to me when I wanted to pursue 35mm work. I find that MF on a tripod in urban scenes even without people in the frame is frustrating with the added weight, cumbersome setup and more time required to capture images. I am just trying to figure out what is the best combination of equipment to achieve "quality" prints without the hassle factor of MF or large format gear. It appears Leica is the answer with the great performance, especially at low light conditions but some loss of film latitude when images are enlarged for gallery hanging. Any other thoughts out there on my ramblings? Ken