Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: M-135 differences
From: n5xrd@juno.com (Richard W. Hemingway)
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 1997 15:23:08 CDT
 
Robb,

>I think I've decided on the following outfit.
>What do you think?
>
>(2) M-6
>24 2.8 asph
>35 2.0 asph
>50 2.0
>90 2.8
>135 4.0
This is an outfit a Nat. Geo photographer would kill for - That's all
folks!!

I had the same outfit except I had the 21/2.8, instead of the 24 ASPH and
the 75/1.4 instead of the 90/2.8.  T he 90/2.8 is a very sharp lens and
usually gets 5 stars.  The 135/4.0 is nearly APO in quality.  I didn't
think the 135/4.0 was hard to focus or use and I think that the 135/2.8
is really too big. - IMHO


Richard Hemingway
Norman, OK