Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 10:25 AM 8/6/97 -0400, Robb Willliamson wrote: >What is everybody's opinion of the (2) 135 lenses for the M? >Is the 135 4.0 hard to focus and frame? >Is the 135 2.8 not as sharp or brilliant at corresponding f-stops as the >135 4.0? The 4/135 has sufficient DOF that focusing is not a problem even wide open. The 4/135 does out-perform the 2.8/135 slightly -- better contrast and resolution -- but the differences are not striking. The major distinction is that the 2.8 is a much heavier and larger lens. Marc msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!