Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In einer eMail vom 05.08.1997 22:07:19, schreiben Sie: >Your saying that the M6 couldn't be improved by what I've proposed? Isn't >its legend predicated by stealth and speed? Or is it, by the reverse >implication, only a ludicrously expensive retro toy? > >What would be an acceptable M6 improvement? > > Never change a winning team ... I bought an M, because she is as she is. You take her in your hands, feel the weight, look through that cristal clear viewfinder, and you know: "It's that!". Nothing compares to the feeling, the connection between the _world outside_ and the way you already feel the pic built up _inside yourself_ by that instrument, long time before you release the shutter. If I would like an automatic, or a cd camera, I would have selected the corresponding one. Other brands have nice lenses also. But those camera-instruments are different, the feeling between you and the pic is different, because the instrument is different - just like in music. When you play a horn, you cannot expect that you hear a violine. I even would like, that Leitz offered a M6 without lightmeter additionally, because the red arrows irritate during the picture creation process. In the end you give more attention to the correct balance of the red arrows than to the pic (that's the reason why I bought an additional M3 yesterday ... and they have a really nice M2 also... <g>) - -Alf