Re: Otto's RTS III V Ted's R7 & R8

["Adisak Soon Wai Hoe" <adisoon@pl.jaring.my>]

Hello,

May I know what article you are talking about?? Care to elaborate on
specifically what the tests said?? Any mention with regard to the M series

- --adi

- ----------
> From: Krzysztof Szecowka <szecowka@ch.wssk.wroc.pl>
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: Otto's RTS III V Ted's R7 & R8
> Date: Wednesday, June 04, 1997 9:42 PM
> 
> At 05:49 4.06.97 -0400, you wrote:
> 
> 
> Lucien,
> 
> I remember this article - it was in Practical Photography (July 1995).
The
> winner was Nikon F4, Contax took the last (7-th) position due to failure
> (overlapping frames). Leica R7 took 5-th place, Minolta Dynax 9xi was
6-th.
> Olympus OM 3 Ti - 4-th, Pentax Z-1p was 3-rd, Canon EOS-1N was 2-nd. The
> test was totally subjective and the score was an average score of 10
> photographers.
> 
> Chris
> 
> >Otto, 
> >
> >You story is consistent with what I heard here in Belgium,
> >even if Contax don't sell a lot of camera here.
> >
> >I remember a comparative test in a British magazine (??)
> >where the Contax body broke during the test.
> >
> >Ted, do you have the same kind of story about Leica R7 and R8 ??
> >
> >
> >Lucien,
> >BELGIUM
> >
> >
> _____________________________
> 
> Krzysztof Szecowka MD
> Dept. of General and Vascular Surgery
> Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny
> Wroclaw, Poland
> ============================