Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/05/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Sticky frames problem
From: Alistair_Stewart_at_LC4001@ccmailgw.mcgawpark.baxter.com
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 11:23:29 -0500

- --IMA.Boundary.768305268
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part

     Harold,
     
     I suggest that you talk to Don Goldberg. 608 838 4769.
     
     Alistair


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Sticky frames problem
Author:  "gess" <gess@icon.co.za> at Internet
Date:    5/1/97 3:18 PM


Greetings
     
Are the viewfinder frames on the M4P particularly prone to sticking. I 
realise that together with the M6 it has more frames than the other Leica 
M's, but I'm finding my M4P particularly problematical. 
     
I bought the camera about 18 months ago from somebody who likes to collect 
rather than use so it was hardly used. Shortly after buying it the frames 
started sticking so I sent it to be sorted out be a Leica repair shop. They 
claimed one of the frames was slightly out of shape and therefore catching 
and replaced it. A few months later the frames started playing up again so 
I sent it to the Leica agents who serviced the whole camera and said that 
the frames were fine but just needed adjusting. Now the ugly problem is 
raring it's ugly head again with the camera not wanting to properly display 
the 35 mm/135 mm frame. When it does turn up that frame it tends to stick 
on it and won't show the other frames unless you wiggle the lever back and 
forth for a while. So, it's back to Leica for fixing again. This is all 
very annoying.
     
Now, what I wanted to find out is, is this a common problem with the M4P, 
is ther an easy solution, and does it occur often with the M6 (as I'm 
considering buying one of those). 
     
Thanks in advance
     
     
Harold
     
     
     
My e-mail addresses are as follows:
     
haroldgess@journalist.com
     
gess@icon.co.za
     
Please use either of these to reach me and, lest you lose sight of it, have 
a nice day!
     
- --IMA.Boundary.768305268
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="RFC822 message headers"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="RFC822 message headers"

Received: from ns1.baxter.com (159.198.180.56) by ccmailgw.mcgawpark.baxter.com
with SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 000DC665; Thu, 1 May 97 11:10:52
- -0500
Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [192.147.236.1]) by
ns1.baxter.com (8.8.0/8.8.0) with ESMTP id LAA17482 for <stewara@baxter.com>;
Thu, 1 May 1997 11:17:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA15924; Thu, 1 May 97 06:13:53 -0700
Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA15917; Thu, 1 May 97 06:13:46 -0700
Received: from harold.icon.co.za (a3-jhb-69.dial-up.net [196.26.216.69]) by
mail2.dial-up.net (8.8.5/8.7.5/ICONfront#1) with ESMTP id PAA16162 for
<leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; Thu, 1 May 1997 15:10:22 +0200 (GMT)
Message-Id: <199705011310.PAA16162@mail2.dial-up.net>
From: "gess" <gess@icon.co.za>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Subject: Sticky frames problem
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 15:18:58 +0200
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us

- --IMA.Boundary.768305268--