Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/02/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well Marc I dont know about anybody else but I am going to tune in some good internet porn. and my old man wants to join me, that and a bottle of OLD CROW heck it dont get any better then that. Marc your right we must all grow up in the real world and the tougher the better, I have three girls 39/45/48 and they went through it all and turned out fine great husbands great kids. The way I see it I want to see/read what I want and every one else has the RIGHT to do the same... T.S. On Thu, 20 Feb 1997, Marc James Small wrote: > Brian > > I dissent from your view, as I AM a supporter of Free Speech. I have never > attempted to limit what my son watches, reads, or listens to, as my own > parents did not, and I cannot imagine a time when I would do so. It is a > TOUGH universe out here in Reality Land, and the quicker kids develop thick > hides and an understanding of how yucky some folks can be, the better off > they will be in the great competition of life. Trying to shield folks from > what goes on is counter-productive and ultimately produces incompetents > incapable of resisting the harshness of the world we all inhabit. > > There are several issues here. First, I don't WANT the gummit intruding > into my decisions as to what to watch or read, nor do I trust them to do so > in my 'best interests'. Rather, I will be responsible for my own son's > moral development, and want the government to keep its Big Hands out of it. > It sounds, Brian, like you have done what a responsible citizen ought to do > -- take charge of their own child's life, in your case by blocking the > Newsgroup he has access to. It doesn't take the Government to do this! We > tend to want Big Brother to do all sorts of things which, ultimately, are > best done through self-help and individual responsibility. > > Second, "porn" is something which is offensive to the watcher, not > "offensive in general" as no such thing exists. There is a LOT out there in > Cyberland that I do not choose to look at or to read, but I do not wish it > limited, in any way. > > Third, the Internet is international by its structure and scope, and your > suggestion, Brian, that it can be controlled by local law is sadly out of > touch with how International Law functions. Look at the German fiasco for a > prime example of this. > > Fourth, I shudder at the thought of any single government, or any group of > governments, trying to censor the 'Net. I want the individual > responsibility of being in charge of my life. Period. Censorship is evil. > Period. > > Marc > > > > msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 > Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir! >