Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/01/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Charles E. Love, Jr. wrote: > > You wrote: > > >Many people praise the current 90/2, but a few say the older/larger > >90/2 is better. Don Chatterton is among them. > > > There have been some comparative tests, including one in Modern, which said > that the newer lens "easily outperforms" the older one. > Don't believe everything you read. Witness Moose Petersen's "dog" comments on the 85/2 Nikkor and the defense it has among LUGers. > >In Leica screw mount, either of the 85/2 or 105/2.5 are great lenses of > >their day, although probably not up to current Leitz standards, still > >great picture takers, though. > > There wasn't any "85/2" Leica screwmount lens. I was referring to the 85/2 and 105/2.5 Nikkors.