Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: 85-90 M and SM lenses
From: creadick@mindspring.com (Nowell & Jennifer Creadick)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 11:26:35 -0500

Very well said Donal..and that is my exact experience also....Nowell

At 9:59 AM 1/29/97, Donal Philby wrote:
>Nicholas,
>Current wisdom is that modern Leica lenses are optimized for color
>depth, not sharpness.  My Nikkors are very sharp, but don't have the
>color and especially the flare control of Leica.  Look at Salgado's book
>"Workers" or especially Marc Riboud's old book "Faces of North Vietnam"
>and you will see a soft richness in the b/w that doesn't seem to come
>out of Nikkor or Canon lenses.  It is not about sharpness.
>
>Recently I shot an informal natural light color portrait of daughter
>with both Nikkor 105macro and a borrowed R4 and 90 2.8.  Both were
>absolutely tack sharp.  But the Leica image just glowed with life. The
>difference was stunning.
>
>Donal Philby
>San Diego
>
>
>
>Nicholas Hartmann wrote:
>>
>>
>> Can the LUG in its collective wisdom recommend a Leica M- or screw-mount
>> lens that is as good as this Nikon optic?
>>
>> Notes: 1) I once tried out a Canadian 90/2.8 Tele-Elmarit and was
>> underwhelmed: the definition, at infinity and f/8, was perceptibly poorer
>> than with either of the Nikkor 85s (f/2 and f/1.8) to which I compared it.

Chapel Hill, NC

Although love may fail, courtesy should prevail.