Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/10/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: Leicaflex
From: "Charles E. Love, Jr." <cel14@cornell.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 17:57:49 -0400 (EDT)

At 12:37 AM 10/9/96 -0700, you wrote:
>At 05:42 PM 10/8/96 +0200, you wrote:
>>It sounds and feels very much unlike the other two cameras. A Leica R4 and a 
>>Minolta XD7 sound and feel very much alike, try operating the wind-on
>lever, fire 
>>the shutter. You'll know what I'm talking about...
>
>Sorry, but I could do that with thick gloves. But then I've used R4s for
>about 13 years. Besides, the R4 is based on the XD-11, the R3 was based on
>the XD-7.
>
No--the R3 was based on the XE-7, which was a completely different camera
from the XD series--larger and with match-needle metering instead of LEDs.

>And the differences were more inside. The film advance, and the shutter and
>body shell were about the only things they had in commmon. The mirror,
>pentaprism, electronics and many other parts were completely different.
>

Yes--the R4 feels much sturdier, and has a brighter viewfinder, than the
XD-11 (I got to use the two of them together once!).  Unfortunate about the
electronics, though!

>===========
>Eric Welch
>Grants Pass, OR
>
>
>
Charles E. Love, Jr.
517 Warren Place
Ithaca, New York
14850
607-272-7338
CEL14@CORNELL.EDU