Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/09/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Other than using a Visoflex, there is a relatively inexpensive solution.
When I use a 135 (the famous Hector) on my M2, I use the terrific Leitz 135
BL finder. The image is very bright and life size. I find it easier to use
than the 135 on my M6.
kw
>Hi All,
>
>I am working on a documentary project and will need to spend a bit more time
>behind the 135mm framelines of my M4-P with 135/4 Tele-Elmar-M attached.
>For those of you who have had this wonderful experience, you will understand
>my lack of joy at the very thought of spending much time in this
>circumstance. The portion of the total viewfinder image represented by the
>135 framelines is such a small fraction that it is VERY difficult to frame
>an image and focus the lens.
>
>I am considering purchasing an M3 because it appears that the 135 framelines
>is a larger portion of the entire viewfinder field and the magnification of
>the viewfinder is closer to 1:1 than the 72% lifesize image of the M4-P.
>Years ago I had an M3 and 135 Hecktor (a gorgeous piece of glass if you ask
>me) and can't remember having any difficulties either framing an image or
>focusing the lens with the combination. For those who might suggest the
>135/2.8, I would add that I have done this, too. I might as well carry my
>Hasselblad with the 250mm for the scant bit of weight I'd be saving! I also
>suppose I could get an M4-2 (because they're cheaper) and have M3 framelines
>put in - but at what cost?
>
>Anyone (including Marc) have any thoughts/advice on the subject?
>
>Thanks friends,
>
>Curt
>
>Elizabeth Mei Wong
>Henry Curtis Miller
>Christopher P.E. Miller
>
>Pittsfield, Massachusetts
>In the Berkshires, next door to Tanglewood
----
Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits
LHSA, MEA, LAW preferred---> <wilcox@umcc.umich.edu>
<kwilcox@genesee.freenet.org>