Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/09/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]rlbunting@lucent.com wrote: > > I have a Leica M3 that I use with a 50mm Summilux as the mainstay of my available light photography. I finally am ready to get a WA lens for this camera. I also rely heavily on the MR-4 light meter mounted on the camera. > > I believe the bug-eye 35mm lens is my main option. I called Leica and found out that it is not possible to modify the view-finder in this camera to include WA frames. > > There is a camera show coming up in my area and I would like to begin the search in earnest. Can you help me with the following info? > > 1) Am I missing an option that would allow me to add a WA lens to the M3? > > 2) Are there quality differences in the line of ranger-finder ready 35mm lenses? I've seen listings for 35mm lenses that range from f3.5 to f1.4. I prefer f2.0, possibly f2.8 for cost considerations. > > Suggestions are greatly appreciated. > > Thanks > > Roger (L. Bunting) > rlbunting@lucent.com You have a number of options. What is best for you depends upon your own preferences and pocketbook. 1) The easiest is to use the M3 with a modern 35 Summicron and separate finder. I suggest the Canon 35 finder because the Leitz briteline costs about 3 times as much and does the same job. The advantage of this solution is that if you eventually upgrade to a later M, you already have the lens for it. Also the latest Summicrons are marginally sharper than the earlier ones. 2) Use the 35/2 Summicron with eyes. This is an older lens, harder to find. Almost all are in a chrome finish. The average price for a Mint- example is about $750. The advantage is no extra finder, the disadvantage is a darker viewfinder image and older optics. 3) You can save about $300 if you choose the 35/2.8 Summaron with eyes. Aproximately the same sharpness. 4) Buy a second, later M body, to use for the wide angles. Stephen Gandy