Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/07/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: Leica quality
From: "C.M. Fortunko" <fortunko@boulder.nist.gov>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 08:55:09 -0600

Hans,

Unfortunately, I must agree with you. 

There are many signs that Leica is taking shortcuts. For example, the
lettering is not as fine as it used to be. Also, I have a Summicron with one
of the letters a different width than the others.

Other signs may be the quality of add-ons. For example, the covers for the
lens mount are now solid plastic and do not have metal parts of Leica logo.
I have a couple of the older ones and they are better.

Look at the new metal lens caps. They are not as solid and thick as the
previous caps.

And the list goes on.

I have an older DR Summicron and the quality of machining is simply
delightful. The lens is extremely smooth and a pleasure to operate. On the
other hand, the new Summicrons appear very tight by comparison.

I am sure that there are internal shortcuts too.

Chris

At 01:55 PM 7/27/96 +0200, you wrote:
>What has happened to Leica quality?
>Two months ago, before my vacation, I replaced my 15 year old Summicron 35
>with a new one, made in Germany. But I was very disappointed, as in the
>middle of my vacation the aperture ring got stuck on F/2, and could not be
>moved...
>As I got home, the lens was sent for free repair, and I am still waiting for
>it after two weeks.
> 
>I have been using a lot of used equipment, even from the 1930s, that has
>never failed. So it was quite a surprise to me that this could happen to
>brand new Leica lenses...
>
>Regards Hans 
>
>
>