Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/07/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: Difference between 2 and 3 lug R lenses.
From: Eric Welch <ewelch@cdsnet.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 18:38:50 -0700

At 05:03 PM 7/20/96 -0700, you wrote:
>hi , 
>i have just acquired a new m6
>and wonder which tele lens i should get 
>any experience with the 90mm 2.8 lens ? 
>who has best prices ? 
>any advice is welcome

We should do a FAQ on this question, no?

The ONLY critereon you should use to buy a lens, if you are a user, who is
serious about your pictures more than your camera (this I am quick to note
is not the only legitimate kind of Leica user! Please no flames!) then get
the lens that gives you the aperture that meets your needs. If you like
available light, and you do a lot of it, the 75 1.4 Summilux is the lens to
get. It's superb. But it's heavy, and expensive. The 90 Summicron is going
to give you better pictures at f/2 than the Elmarit. It's a good compromise.
If you don't need the speed, the Elmarit will save you weight, money and
will be superb in performance. 

They are all Leicas, and will give you wonderful images. Find one in your
price/speed range, and jump on it.

===================
Eric Welch
Grants Pass (OR) Daily Courier
NPPA Region 11 JIB chair

Zen master to hotdog vendor: "Make me One with everything"