Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/07/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Eric, I detect a snooty attitude on your part. Reread your reply to my post. Your reply does not address WHAT I said but only your distorted perception of what I said. I was referring to the finish my R7 and its ability to mar readily. I said nothing about whether I liked the camera. As a matter of record, I like my R7 very much as I like the 19mm to 250mm lenses that I have for it. However it is not perfect and I question whether Lieca is manufacturing the finest camera they know how or whether they have instituted cost restraints in materials, design etc. At the prices asked, Leica equipment should be the finest in materials and workmanship that is humanly possible. I see nothing in the workmanship or design of the R7 that will make it a "collectible". That was my point. Paul T. Collura pcollura@epix.net > At 02:44 PM 7/16/96 -0400, you wrote: > > >predating The current equipment. My R7 is terribly marred from normal > >handling. The finish does not hold up to normal use although I admit to > >being less genteel with this piece than with my M6s . True collectibles > >are those that are made so well that they become classics in design, > >quality or both. > > That is a matter of opinion (like that WAS a new thought!). I like the way > the R7 works very well. It just needs faster flash sync, more sophisticated > fill, and AF. Other than that, I love it. What works for you doesn't > necessarily translate. I learned the R series cameras that are chrome tend > to hold up better than the black ones. Too bad my R7 isn't chrome. > > =================== > Eric Welch >