Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/07/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 02:40 PM 7/16/96 -0400, you wrote: >Second, I smell a whiff of racism in this sort of statement. Eric pointed >out earlier that it's objectionable to use the term "Jap." But entirely too >many Leica and Hasselblad fans carry with them the assumption that anything Oops, Zeiss lenses for 35mm are made in Japan, with only a few being made in Germany. It's not racism in this case, I don't think. If it is, then shame on those who believe so. It's just that traditionally the German and Japanese lens makers have had differences of opinions on what was important in lens design. One is not inherintly superior to the other. In fact, Canon, for one, makes some lenses that are every bit as good as Leicas, or better. The one that comes to mind is the 300 2.8. These days, all lenses are so good that there really is not significant performance differences in the ares of sharpness and contrast. Each lens maker has their value judgements, some of us prefer Leica, some Zeiss, some Nikon and some Canon. My choices are Leica and Canon. =================== Eric Welch Grants Pass (OR) Daily Courier NPPA Region 11 JIB chair (D)inner not ready: (A)bort (R)etry (P)izza.