Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/07/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You wrote: > >I thought the only "real" Leica was an M. I thought the superiority of the >optics was largely a matter of the design possibilities that a rangefinder >allows. I mean if you are going to shoot SLR, why not Contax or Nikon? >And then if you must shoot Leica SLR, it would seem that an SL or SL 2 >would be the only way to go. You know, German through and through, not some >Jap/German hybrid, which is neither fish nor fowl. That's from my limited >observation. I personally would never spend the kind of cash that's needed >for a current R series. > > Even the Leica M-6 is over priced. It's an excellent camera and >the optics are unsurpassed, but it's far from perfect. I sold mine and >bought a Mamiya 6. I don't have enough cash for both. I'm doing it out of >curiosity. That's the same reason I bought the M-6. Some day if I ever >become wealthy enough, I will get another Leica. But for now I am going to >explore MF. > > Claude. > > > You thought wrong. John