Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/06/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: Mamiya M7 vs Leica M6...
From: Wolfgang Sachse <sachse@msc.cornell.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 09:01:18 -0400 (EDT)

> 
> > the metering is separate to the
> > viewing and taking systems. Thus it does not alter its angle of view
> > according
> > to the lens used: with the 43mm fisheye it is a virtual spotmeter, with
> > the 150m
> > telephoto (and, it is rumoured, longer lenses to follow shortly) it
> > actually
> > meters some of the surroundings as well. To my mind this is acceptable
> > if you
> > have only one lens (ideally the 65mm) but makes a mockery of the
> > automation when
> > a range of lenses are used.

	Hi -

	I have the M7 and after 500+ photographs, have never
	had an improperly exposed image that is the result of
	meter angle of view; and I often use it as a `Point &
	Shoot'. Admittedly, I only shoot print film in this
	camera. Note: This camera also has exposure lock
	capability which is useful for very uneven illumination.

	As to the lenses, I can only comment on the 65mm/f4
	and it's superb. I've made 16X20 enlargements, and
	they're, well, WOW.

	For me: Landscapes, architectural, etc. ==> M7
		(or even better, Seitz, Roundshot)
		People, events, etc. ======> Leica, M6

	-- Wolfgang

Panorama photos: http://www.msc.cornell.edu/~sachse/panorama/panorama.html
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Wolfgang Sachse                             Cornell University
    sachse@msc.cornell.edu      http://www.msc.cornell.edu/~sachse
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


In reply to: Message from oguillemain@agora.fdn.fr (Olivier Guillemain) (Re: Mamiya M7 vs Leica M6)