Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/05/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 11:31 AM 5/27/96 -0400, Gary Toop wrote: > That's interesting: in the April `96 edition of Popular >Photography, both lenses were reviewed and were given quite high praise: >PP said that they would perform better than "most" lenses in their >class and the SQF data looked pretty good. Did the posters have any >explanation for the discrepancy? C'mon, Gary! Adorama is one of Pop's largest advertisers: is the positive test result any surprise? The lenses will be, at best, mediocre. Buy Leica, buy an old Canon, buy a Russar -- but these will be, I suspect, distinguished only by their lack of distinction. Marc msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!