Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/05/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
On 13 May 96 at 13:20, Edi Weitz wrote about "Only 100,000
exposures???":
> Hi Group!
>
> Last weekend I was in Cologne and discovered a nice camera store
> called "Foto Gregor" [located at the "Neumarkt" place in the
> city's center]. They have an extra room for Leicas filled with
> many show cases full of new and used Leicas. Mainly collectors will
> be impressed by their huge collection of special editions, I
> think. E.g., they had an M6 with Michael Schumacher's autograph
> engraved... [He , who buys something like that??]
I think Leica is pretty slick in inventing limited
editions/collector items. Wasn't there a special series recently
made for a VIP in the Middle-East?
> But I'm digressing. I took with me the Leica brochures about the
> R6.2 and the R7. Although I'm only interested in rangefinder
> cameras I like the Leica pamphlets and thought it to be a good
> reading for the train. To my surprise I found out that both
> pamphlets had the following sentence in it:
>
> "Leica R cameras are designed for at least 100,000 exposures."
> [My own translation]
>
> OK, they didn't write that your Leica will take itself apart after
> you made exposure number 100,000 but - 100,000 exposures isn't
> that much for professional use, or am I wrong? Is this a typo or
> wha ? Any hints?
A Nikon F4 is rated for 160,000, the F90 for 80,000.
Never saw numbers for EOS.
Perhaps 100.000 is the amount it takes *without* servicing....not
sure whether either F4 or EOS-1 does the same....
Bye,
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ illem _/ _/ an _/ _/ _/ arkerink
_/_/_/
The difference
between men and boys
is the price of their toys
<w.j.markerink@a1.nl>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]