Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/03/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You wrote: > >I just acquired one of these to upgrade my P150. Most interesting: it is >an all-metal lens made in Portugal replacing the original all-plastic >made-in-Germany Hektor. The optical quality IS somewhat better than that of >the Hektor and the field illumination appears to be corner-to-corner, >resolving the primary complaint I've had with the original lens. The only >drawback is that it is quite a bit heavier than the Hektor, and the focusing >is thus a bit slower. > >The price was reasonable, $150 US, and delivery time was -- are you ready >for this? THREE DAYS. I still have back-orders from Leica (the camera >adaptor and two eyepieces for my APO-Televid spotting scope) which are now >more than a year old. There's also a non-CF version available for the same >price. > >Marc > >msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 >Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir! > >Last month Leica sent me a 90mm.2.5 CF lens for my P150 and I agree it is better than the Hektor lens. With the Hector, I couldn't get half of my slide in focus due to the curve in the slide for the heat lamp. With this lens I can now get about 3/4 of the slide is focus which is a big improvement, however when I shoot a photograph at f16 with a 24mm lens, and the depth of field should be to China, I don't think it is too much to ask for the entire slide to be in focus. I gave up talking to Leica about this since they think I am asking too much of a projector that cost only $239. If it is being to demanding to expect a slide shot with a $2000 lens to be 100% in focus when projected by a slide projector made by the same manufacturer with the upgrades lens, then something is truly wrong. Mel Weinstein