Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/02/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I am curious to know what differences, if any, people have seen between pictures taken with the 2.8 Summaron, the old chrome 35 mm Summicron, the latest 35 Summicron and the 35 mm Summilux. Although I would be interested to know about techical differences between the images produced by the two lenses, I am more curious to know what kind of subjective differences people pick out in the images produced by these lenses. For example, although it would certainly be useful to know which of the recent 35mm Summicron and the 35mm Summilux produced a contrastier image at, say, F2, it would be even more interesting to hear about what kind of a difference people see in the `feel' of these two lenses at wider apertures, if indeed there is any. What things to people like about them and what things do people dislike? Many thanks in advance for any shared opinions. Gary