[Leica] What is the definition of "Fine Art Photography"?

[Douglas Barry]

I don't think that photo is of a French location, as it looks like the 
Glenfinnan viaduct in Scotland at a guess, Philippe.
Mind you, I haven't been there, but Harry Potter and those trips to the 
cinema with my youngest.....

Douglas

On 27/05/2021 15:28, Philippe via LUG wrote:
> I’d just replace «  has to be explained «  by «requires some knowledge of the background by the viewer, and some thought by the same »
>
> Other than that, it may also refer to even documentary photos that have aged well, i.e. that, seen from a distance, look like time-capsules.
>
> I often have in mind those photos of railway bridges and sceneries that decorated the train cars of my youth. These adverts then looked pretty dull to everyone. But I’d be very happy to have a collection of them today.
> E.g. https://fr.dreamstime.com/train-vapeur-pont-voûte-noir-blanc-image103300702
>
>   
> Amities
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
>> Le 27 mai 2021 à 06:14, Doug Herr via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> a écrit :
>>
>> My definition - which I expect is not widely accepted - is photography that has to be explained to be understood.
>>
>> Doug Herr
>> Birdman of Sacramento
>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com <http://www.wildlightphoto.com/>
>>
>>
>>> On May 26, 2021, at 6:58 PM, Stasys Petravicius via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Stasys Petravicius
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information