[Leica] Leica apo 135mm M v. Canon 70-200 f/4 L zoom at 200mm with Canon 2x extender

[Frank Filippone]

Paul, can you elaborate on the comparison?  Different focal lengths produce
different areas of interest. Do you blow up the Leica image in LR or other
so that the comparison shows the same area of interest?
Canon = 1x
Leica = 3x
???
Did you put the 2x converter on the Leica to see it compared to the
Canon.With converter and lens  set at 135?
What about the corners?

On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 1:12 PM Paul Roark via LUG <lug at leica-users.org>
wrote:

> I already knew the Leica 135 apo could seem more detail than the Canon L
> series 70-200mm zoom at 200mm.  What about the Canon zoom at 200mm with a
> Canon 2x extender?  I just tried both on my Sony a7c, focused on a distant
> hilltop.
>
> See https://www.paulroark.com/Canon-zoom-v-Leica-apo135.JPG .
>
> Close, and no comparison on a weight & size adjusted basis.
>
> For what it's worth,
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
-- 
Frank Filippone
BMWRed735i at gmail.com