[Leica] IMG: Macro Experiment with Leica-R 60 Elmarit Macro Lens
Richard Clompus
rclompus at mac.com
Mon Oct 19 18:19:50 PDT 2020
Jim, both images are clear but I prefer the one with the extension tubes. I have the 2X R Apo extender that produces sharper images than the non-Apo extender. The Apo is a lot more costly but it does provide additional clarity and contrast compared to the non-Apo version. Most people probably wouldn’t notice the difference if the image is sharpened a bit.
Thanks for posting.
Be well,
Richard
Richard Clompus
California
> On Oct 8, 2020, at 11:10 AM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote:
>
> I've been using the Leica-R 60 macro lens for a few days and began wondering which gave the best results, adding the dedicated extension tube or the tube plus the Leica-R 2X Extender. So, I did a kitchen counter experiment. Using kitchen lights and a shiny dime, I first combined the dedicated extension tube with the 2X extender and mounted the assembly on an old Star-D tripod. I adjusted the height so that the image of the dime filled the height of the frame, and took several exposures. Here is the resulting image:
>
> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20201008-DSCF2180.JPG.html
>
> I then removed the 2X Extender and mounted the lens and extension tube as it was intended to be used. I took several images of the dime, which now filled about half the height of the frame, and cropped the resulting image to match the first one:
>
> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20201008-DSCF2192.JPG.html
>
> It is my opinion that the lens/tube combination is sharper without the 2X Extender, even with enlargement. I am ignoring differences in lighting with this setup.
>
> --
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
More information about the LUG
mailing list