[Leica] Advantages of M lenses on the SL compared to R lenses? Adapters?
Douglas Herr
wildlightphoto at earthlink.net
Tue Jan 15 14:28:29 PST 2019
The SL lenses will do well with higher-resolution sensors; MUCH higher resolution IMHO. I got excessive aliasing and color moire when photographing fine feather details with the 90-280 APO. Once a 40+ MP L-mount body becomes available I’ll re-evaluate the system.
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 9:47 AM, James Handsfield <jhandsfield at att.net> wrote:
>
> Last October in Wetzlar, Peter Karbe presented data for the SL prime lenses - the 50mm in particular. The image quality, based on the M lenses, was off the scale. The SL lenses, based on Leica data and not inhibited by size and not miniaturized, are the best lenses Leica has ever made.
>
> -------------------------------------
> Education is its own reward, both for the individual and for society.
>
> Jim Handsfield
> jhandsfield at att.net
>
>> On Jan 15, 2019, at 11:08 AM, Tina Manley via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote:
>>
>> I agree. I have the SL and all of the adapters for R and M lenses;
>> however, I find myself reaching for the SL lenses instead.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
More information about the LUG
mailing list