[Leica] IMGS: Reticulation

[Peter Dzwig]

IMHO, personally it doesn't work for me. I found it distracting, keeping me
wondering "what is it about these pictures?" all the time I was looking at them.
Even at small scale I was aware of it.

Peter

On 02/11/2017 20:18, Ted Grant wrote:
> Hi Tina,
> Both are interesting, simply because the composition, content/subject are
> strong enough and interesting enough they over ride any reticulation aspect
> as seen here on screen. However? as a photo on say glossy photo paper there
> might be a tiny bit of visual annoyance.
> Not knowing about reticulation I bet 9 out of 10 viewers wouldn't see it.
> Nor? They wouldn't be wise enough to understand reticulation?? 
> cheers
> ted 
> Dr. ted grant  O.C.   :-)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
> Tina Manley
> Sent: November-01-17 12:58 PM
> To: MUGers at yahoogroups.com; Leica Users Group; paw; seephoto; Olympus Camera
> Discussion
> Subject: [Leica] IMGS: Reticulation
> 
> PESO:
> 
> I've run across some more of the reticulated film.  This time it's street
> scenes instead of people:
> 
> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/166499822
> 
> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/166499996
> 
> Instead of trying to get rid of it, I enhanced it a little with contrast
> and sharpening.  Different enough to be a feature?
> 
> Tina
> 

-- 

===========================================================
Dr Peter Dzwig