[Leica] noct .95 ?

John McMaster john at mcmaster.co.uk
Wed Jul 19 10:00:32 PDT 2017


Works well with the M series, so if you have the body and lens much cheaper than an SL ;-)

john

-----Original Message-----

Not sure how the SL EVF would work with that...

Bob Adler
www.robertadlerphotography.com

> On Jul 19, 2017, at 9:13 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Or an ND1.8 or stronger for those with (slightly) less money ;-)
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Both noctiluxes can now be used in full daylight wide open. With the SL having an electronic shutter speed capable of 1/16,000 sec (apparently ISO dependent) it is no problem...
> There. I just got you thinking about parting with about $12,000 US!
> 
> Best,
> Bob
> 
> Bob Adler
> www.robertadlerphotography.com
> 
>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 3:19 PM, lluisripollphotography <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Steve,
>> 
>> I’ve never owned a Nocti because for my style I would rarely use it wide open, on the other hand is an expensive and quite big lens. However I’ve tested all the versions of the Nocti, the 1.2, the 1.0 E58 and E60, and the 0.95. If I could afford one I would be decided for the 1.0, the 0.95 is absolute perfection, I think it can replace any other 50mm you have (except the APO), the 1.0 is still magical….. A friend of mine has bought a minty 0,95 for 6.000 Euro, if you are patient you can find one.
>> 
>> Good luck my friend!
>> 
>> Amitiés
>> Lluis
>> 
>> 
>>> El 19 jul 2017, a les 0:05, Steve Barbour <stevebarbour at mac.com> va escriure:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 2:38 PM, RicCarter <ric at cartersxrd.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> curious about why your preference for the 1 over the .95
>>> 
>>> Yes, me too.
>>> 
>>> and thank you all, for your help.
>>> 
>>> Steve
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ric
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 5:26 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> To be honest, I use my f1.0 far more than the f0.95.... but neither are for sale ;-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> john
>>>>> 



More information about the LUG mailing list