[Leica] Eclipse photos
Aram
leica_r8 at hotmail.com
Thu Aug 24 17:35:38 PDT 2017
You did well. Wasn't it amazing? This was my second one. Saw 1979. I
love your description of comparing total with partial. You are so correct
and no one will ever know unless they experience it for themselves.
This one was such a short one. 79 was about a minute longer if I recall.
2024 will be 6 minutes at center. 6 minutes. I can hardly imagine that.
Hope it will be #3 for me.
Aram
-----Original Message-----
From: Howard L Ritter Jr
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 11:38 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: [Leica] Eclipse photos
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/hlritter/Eclipse/
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/hlritter/Eclipse/>
As a lifelong amateur astronomer and photographer, I sympathized with Larry
Z’s recent advice to forget about photographing the eclipse and just watch
it.
As a lifelong amateur astronomer and photographer, I felt free to ignore the
advice!
My son and I drove from Raleigh and Charlotte to the town of Murphy, where
the path of totality would cross the extreme SW corner of North Carolina.
Weather turned out better than predicted: Hardly a cloud to be seen, and not
one on the face of the Sun until 5 seconds after the Moon fully departed it.
To supplement the visual enjoyment, I brought my 100-mm binocular telescope
with eyepieces for 21x and metal-on-glass filters to go over the objective
lenses. These came off at totality for what turned out to be a spectacular
view of the Sun’s corona and numerous prominences rising up past the
silhouette of the Moon. I also brought my Nikon D810A with an 80-400 Nikkor
zoom equipped with a similar filter. I did experience some frustration
trying to get good focus with the camera, and I wonder whether the quality
of the glass filter was not good enough to match the native performance of
the lens. There is a neutral-density glass filter with nearly the same
optical density as this reflective filter, and I’m tempted to try it just to
see if I can get better detail on the Sun.
In any case, the experience of watching a total eclipse of the Sun was every
bit as spectacular and ethereal as I’d hoped it would be. I’d seen numerous
partial eclipses, and I can tell you that no partial eclipse of less than
99% or so prepares you for that happens as that last 1% disappears, and
nothing at all about a partial eclipse even resembles the sight of totality.
During the partial phase there’s a dark bite out of the Sun in a bright sky,
but as the last sliver of Sun disappears, the level of illumination drops
precipitously and dramatically, and the winking out of the last remnant is
like…no, it’s NOT like anything else. The whole world goes dim, fast and
shockingly. And whereas the partially eclipsed Sun of practically any degree
still looks like a brilliant spot too bright to look at in a blue sky, the
eclipsed Sun is totally different. There’s now a glowing nimbus surrounding
a terrifying black hole where the Sun used to be, none of which was visible
until totality. It’s other-worldly and sinister. We’re used to seeing
nothing change in real time in the heavens, just slow day-to-day changes and
a constant, reliable Sun. In the last seconds before totality we see the
actual movement of heavenly bodies and then the obscuration of the Sun, and
it’s too massive and overpowering and beyond human scale to understand or
tolerate with a placid mind. No wonder the ancients were terrified of these
things!
I got a few good shots, and one bystander who asked if he could take a
picture through the binoculars with his iPhone got a one-in-a-million shot –
as well as proving that decent images of the event could be gotten this way.
—howard
More information about the LUG
mailing list