[Leica] Film exposure error - how to correct it
Paul Roark
roark.paul at gmail.com
Wed Aug 16 20:09:57 PDT 2017
It's been a long time since I developed film, but my memory is that Xtol
was about the only one that was actually able to increase the shadow
details/effective film speed, particularly without excessive contrast and
grain in the more exposed areas of the image.
FWIW
Paul
www.PaulRoark.com
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> You need a two-stop push. Lots of custom labs can do that. You’ll still
> have very thin shadows if they’re there at all but at least your film will
> not be under developed and can be printed with normal grades of paper.
> You may get a few viable images off the roll.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photographer
>
> On 8/16/17, 5:53 AM, "LUG on behalf of Gerry Walden" <lug-bounces+mark=
> rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of gerry.walden at icloud.com>
> wrote:
>
> My advice would be to talk to the lb guy at Ilford, I feel sure he
> will give it the best treatment.
>
> Gerry
>
> Gerry Walden LRPS
> www.gwpics.com
> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 or
> +44 (0)797 287 7932
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 16 Aug 2017, at 10:21, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I put my M3 back in to use over the vacation. I was exposing the
> film in it as
> > ASA400 assuming that I had one of my usual films in it.
> >
> > HOWEVER ( :-( ) I found that I had a roll of 125 ASA FP4+ in it when
> I came to
> > the end of the roll. When I started using it I had noticed that I
> had already
> > exposed some 10 frames. So I have 10 frames exposed at 125 ASA and
> 25 - or
> > thereabouts - exposed as 400 ASA. Most of the shots taken when I was
> assuming it
> > was 400 were exposed in the region of f8 - f16 at 1/500th.
> >
> > I send film to Ilford to process. My question is: how should I tell
> them to
> > develop it?
> >
> > I think I have the following options:
> >
> > (i) DON'T - just bin it and write it off to bad luck!
> >
> > (ii) Develop it as (say) 200 ASA, accept that some will be
> under-exposed and
> > that the rest will be over exposed and sort it out when I scan the
> film and play
> > with it in PS or NikFX (or whatever). The short exposure times on
> the 400 ASA
> > shots may help as they will be on he darker side.
> >
> > (iii) Develop it as one or the other (125 or 400 ASA)
> >
> > Any other thoughts/recommendations?
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > PS I know that I should shoot a whole roll before i forget what the
> film is and
> > go off on autopilot :-)
> > --
> >
> > ===========================================================
> > Dr Peter Dzwig
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
More information about the LUG
mailing list