[Leica] 135mm Apo-Telyt-M on Sony a7rii
Jim Nichols
jhnichols at lighttube.net
Mon Mar 21 14:11:28 PDT 2016
Thanks, Richard. Nice DoF, in spite of Paul's misgivings.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 3/21/2016 4:05 PM, Richard Man wrote:
> This seems to work:
> http://www.paulroark.com/OldAlamoPintadoHouse_SantaYnezValley.jpg
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The link doesn't work?
>>
>> Tina
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Paul Roark <roark.paul at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My latest acquisition is the 135mm lens. I must admit, I'm having to
>>> re-learn a few things. This lens on the 42mp Sony is reminding me that
>> DOF
>>> is really just differing degrees of unsharpness. What I, in the past
>>> (pre-135 Apo), thought was my "infinity" focus set target across a canyon
>>> from my back yard, turns out not to be at "infinity." This lens-camera
>>> combo has no DOF. Getting focus right-on is nearly impossible due to the
>>> potential this combo has.
>>>
>>> At any rate, since I like the appearance of things being sharp, the first
>>> non-test shot a couple of days ago turned into a test of whether I could
>> at
>>> least approach the potential of the lens in a real world, relatively fast
>>> shooting, hand held, focus stacked shot. Here is the answer:
>>>
>>> OldAlamoPintadoHouse_SantaYnezValley.jpg
>>>
>>> (After a few years of drought in So. California, the greenery this year
>> was
>>> something I could not resist. So, this one is in color.)
>>>
>>> This took 19 shots. (Farm workers where moving into the field just to
>> the
>>> right, so my tripod was not an option.) A fair amount of PS work was
>>> required to mash the exposures together, but the bottom line is probably
>>> within what I'd call acceptable results from a technical point of view.
>>>
>>> It's not perfect, but by comparison, it beat the 90mm Canon Tilt-Shift,
>>> which I used to think was a great lens. (Not so much any more.)
>>>
>>> So, bottom line, I think I'll be able to use this optic, but it's not
>>> forgiving at all.
>>>
>>> BTW, I suspect the "used" "Mint" lens I bought from a major dealer was,
>> in
>>> fact, "new" pre-6-bit-coding unit from inventory that they are dumping.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>> www.PaulRoark.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tina Manley
>> www.tinamanley.com
>> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
>>
>> http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
More information about the LUG
mailing list