[Leica] LUG Yearbook 2015 aftermath

[Peter Dzwig]

Richard,

one disappointment should not make you withdraw from 2016's book. It's a bit
like, or at least hanging an exhibition, you made your decisions - which we
allowed you to do - and that should be it.

In any exhibition you may not like the juxtaposition of images, but that doesn't
detract from the value of the exhibition as a whole.

If it worries you that much, you could perhaps offer the choice not to change
the pairing submitted by the photographer.

Keep at it!

Peter

On 18/01/2016 00:27, Richard Man wrote:
> By now, a number of you have received your LUG Yearbook and some of you are
> just buying them right now. Once Blurb book pays me, I will forward the
> proceed to the Second Harvest Food Bank
> 
> I have received numerous kudos on and off the list. Thank you for your kind
> comments. They are appreciated.
> 
> Today I have received the first disappointment about the pairing effort.
> The person does not like what they see (presumably from the Blurb preview).
> 
> If one person sees a problem, chances are there are at least another
> person, may be 2-3 more, that are likewise disappointed.
> 
> While I understand that "can't please everyone" I consider this as a
> failure in this experiment.
> 
> Therefore I will not be handling the 2016 LUG Book.
> 
> I do recommend that future volunteer should use InDesign as it is a far
> more flexible tool but of course it will be up to the personYear.
> 
> All the best
> 

-- 

===========================================================
Dr Peter Dzwig