[Leica] Leica SL: Worst Camera of the Year?

[Ted Grant]

Hi Crew,
There wasn't, nor is there anything wrong with a Hasselblad if you are using
the 2 1/4 120 film cameras. During part of my Leica life I also used 3
Hasselblad cameras when shooting for some clients and magazines. As the
Photo editor or the art directors called the shot on acceptable film size!
ERGO? If you wanted to do assignments for  their magazine you worked with
their size.
Now maybe what you lads are talking about is some "Mickey Mouse?" China made
35mm size badged Hasselblad that could well be a piece of copy-cat junk?

But there isn't anything wrong, nor was there anything with a 2 1/4 120 film
size Hassie as they were a wonderful machine to work with. Only the odd time
the 2 1/4  Sq.format was a bit of a pain in the ass!
cheers,
Dr. ted

-----Original Message-----
From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Ken Carney
Sent: January-12-16 4:59 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica SL: Worst Camera of the Year?

I thought Hasselblad's were good cameras? Used by the astronauts and all 
that?

On 1/12/2016 11:03 AM, Robert Baron wrote:
> http://photorumors.com/2016/01/11/2015-worst-camera-of-the-year-vote-now/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus