[Leica] IMGS: Tests with MM and M246

[John McMaster]

They are completely static subjects.....

john
________________________________________

They are to me.

Tina

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:29 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:

> Waste of time then, they are your cameras but what you show are not
> worthwhile tests ;-)
>
> john
>
> ________________________________________
>
> As I have said before, I do not do controlled tests on tripods.  I do real
> life tests the way I would use the cameras.  Tripod tests would be of no
> use to me since I never use a tripod.  I hold the camera or prop it on the
> nearest post.  It works for me, maybe not for others.
>
> Tina
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:43 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:
>
> > Not on a tripod so hard to compare (viewpoint changes), look for tonality
> > differences at 320-1600asa as the 246 is better at +5000asa
> >
> > john
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > PESO:
> >
> > I did some tests with the Noctilux and Summilux on the MM and M246.  I
> > have a hard time telling the files apart.  I did notice that neither
> camera
> > records the aperture correctly because all of the photos were either shot
> > wide open or at F/8 and they were not recorded that way.  I also shot
> some
> > with both cameras at ISO 6400 but that was not recorded either. The M246
> > files are about half the size of the MM files.  These are the ones shot
> > with the 50/1.4:
> >
> > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/162551679
> >
> > and hit next until the end.  These have absolutely nothing done to them
> > except importing into LR as raw files and exporting to pBase as jpegs.
> I'll
> > post the Noctilux ones later.
> >
> > Tina
> >
> > --
> > Tina Manley
> > www.tinamanley.com
> > http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/
> >
> >